| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
TheUnimind
Joined: 28 Nov 2006
Posts: 4
WR Updates: 583,584
TheUnimind WR Profile
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 2:15 am Post subject: US-Blackwater Raiders faulty rating again |
|
|
| Please look at the top 3 in Alliance..number 3 has almost more 80's than 1 and 2 combined and almost double in active members according to your info. I try to submit data but if it's erroneous anyway what's the use. Been like this for awhile now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dromic
Joined: 17 Jul 2007
Posts: 126
Location: 3rd Rock from the Sun
WR Updates: 836,590
Dromic WR Profile
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
- - -
________
marijuana vaporizer
Last edited by Dromic on Fri Feb 04, 2011 12:08 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUnimind
Joined: 28 Nov 2006
Posts: 4
WR Updates: 583,584
TheUnimind WR Profile
|
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok i think you totally misunderstood me on this. I wasn't basing it on personal data that i see on my census that i upload but on the info right on your site when you click the individual info per guild on the site that shows how many 80's and what not.
Let's do this then.
Now to make it easier lets just choose alliance side between the number 1 and number two ranked guilds.
On wow armory as a basis first shows number 1 has 217 members with 117 level 80's and number 2 has 473 with 216 80's.
Now if i go to your site, not my personal info, but the data you collected from all entires, the active members on number 1 is 146 with 90 80's.
Number 2 has 242 active with 152 80's active. To verifiy i just click on the name on your site and go to the graph.
Now both your website and armory show number 2 being a lot larger in level and total members. Your website also shows more active members by level and numbers on number 2. The 80's in number 2 alone that your website says active way pass number 1 in total active period regardless of level.
Thsi is the error i speak off. Not the info i collected but the the info reflective on your site. The parsing is wrong and pretty obvious. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rollie
Site Admin

Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 5364
Location: Austin, TX
WR Updates: 480,131
Rollie WR Profile
|
Posted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah, there is an outstanding problem with the rankings that I need to really dig into. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TheUnimind
Joined: 28 Nov 2006
Posts: 4
WR Updates: 583,584
TheUnimind WR Profile
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Well it has been over 10 days since the last response and now the guild ranked number 6 on the BWR server and number 2 on alliance has more active 80's than the total active members of any guild on the top 10 and has an extra 125 active. This is one hell of an error. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|